Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irish Unionist Party (2020)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Unionist Party (2020)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per the discussion at Talk:Irish_Unionist_Party_(2020)#Delete, I propose that this article be deleted for falling short of the relevant notability criteria. In short, in terms of:

WP:NGO (which suggests that an "organization's longevity, size of membership, major achievements, prominent scandals, or other factors specific to the organization should be considered [in determining notability]") is not met. In short, this appears to be a very small org (somewhere between perhaps 1 and 20 people?), that has barely existed for a few months (Nov 2021?).
WP:SIGCOV (which expects significant coverage in reliable independent sources) is not met. In short, pretty much all of the coverage of this topic seems to derived from a single sensationalist piece in the Irish Sun. A source which itself is covered under WP:THESUN for exactly this type of sensationalist "journalism". And which seems to have begat all/most of the other coverage. (The Irish Central piece, for example, refers to and is effectively a reprint of the Irish Sun content. As are the other web-only reprints.)
WP:ORGDEPTH (which expects coverage that "extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the org") isn't met. In that we have two "bursts" of coverage. One in Nov 2021, reprints/replications of the Irish Sun's "org created" article. And another glut in Feb 2022, of the "some people still don't like my controversial views" variety. Neither of which is enough to expand beyond the very scant detail in the article. ("Teenager creates website and political group which is not registered to contest elections anywhere.")

While not wishing to seem disparaging, the subject here seems to be a very small group of people (perhaps just one person), created by a teenager, armed with a free Wix.com website and a sticker maker. That has been the subject of some "get a load of this guy" coverage in a small number of sources (the seed of which being a source which the community has agreed is to be avoided to support content or a notability claim). Guliolopez (talk) 19:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 19:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - still here? delete per non notable org. Spleodrach (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 01:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Organization fails WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.