Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran-IAEA side deals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any redirect is a separate editorial decision. Sandstein 07:52, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iran-IAEA side deals[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a WP:POINTY fork of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action which was created by a declared SPA User:Iran nuclear weapons 2 whose User page claims his account is a valid alt account because he's afraid of being assassinated by Iran if his primary account is exposed ... I'm pretty sure VAJA has better things to do than go after Wikipedia editors in (Redacted) ... BlueSalix (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OH sheesh, the "redacted" bit was Wasilla, Alaska ... see: [1]. I note this just so we aren't reinforcing "Iran Nuclear Weapons 2" ultra-disruptive, Islamaphobic paranoia/James Bond fantasy that someone actually knew where he was located and Iranian commandos are descending on his home at this very moment because of an edit he made on WP. (It is slightly concerning this has to be explained.) BlueSalix (talk) 06:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:17, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete or Redirect to Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - Cwobeel (talk) 03:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 06:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge -- the whole thing has a strong feel of being a fork, of a kind that it usually best merged back to the main article. I have not considered whether there is anything worth merging (as opposed to a plain redirect). Peterkingiron (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.