Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqbal Seth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Saurashtra cricketers. Daniel (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iqbal Seth[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:GNG is of no relevance; he has played a first class match and therefore passes WP:CRIN. DevaCat1 (talk) 16:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Saurashtra cricketers or similar Has played 1 FC match, but no coverage. Using similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY when a player has 1 or a few matches but no coverage, they are deleted/redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG is general so it applies to all articles. The total failure of it here needs to lead to deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Saurashtra cricketers - I strongly disagree with CRIN taking priority over GNG in this case. In fact, by consensus, a trivial passing of CRIN is a weak, weak presumption of notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG, the single first-class appearance doesn't seem to be covered by any substantial source. --Ashley yoursmile! 18:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.