Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iowa Is Closed Today

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @078 · 00:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa Is Closed Today[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I just PRODded this, but then noticed a previous prod had been contested. My remarks were: Does not meet the inclusion standard WP:NFILMS; not presently a notable film. (See, e.g., the 17 Google hits.) Glenfarclas (talk) 01:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; insufficient sources to establish notability. Evil saltine (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From talk page: "This is an upcoming film being produced by a reputable film company. The film has been entered into numerous festivals and is in fact notable. Ak2036 (talk)"

Delete at this time. The film is "upcoming" which means there can be no current indications of notability. the fact that the talk page says it's being produced by a reputable company does not mean that the film is currently notable. Nor being entered in festivals confer notability. If the film was to win an award at one of these then it's possible that it may become notable. something lame from CBW 02:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 04:31, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (for now). If the film receives significant coverage in the future, the article can always be restored. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 04:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this article is gone in seven days. JBsupreme (talk) 08:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice as being premature. Wkipedia can wait until this thing perhaps gets some press. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 10:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.