Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ioke (programming language)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft delete. This discussion has several editors, but still has a consensus for soft deletion (based on notability issues). It can be restored by any admin on request Nosebagbear (talk) 13:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ioke (programming language)[edit]

Ioke (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another non-notable and abandoned computer language. Last updated in 2010, no evidence of notability. Guy Macon (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone have any objections to me closing this discussion and applying WP:PROD? Would G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion be appropriate? Template:Db-a7 says "software, or other creative works or educational institutions are not eligible under this criterion." so I am thinking Template:Db-g11. Suggestions are welcome. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I previously relisted this as effectively a WP:NAC, before I realised the possibility of treating it as a soft delete, so reverted myself (as I obviously can't effect that closure!). Have no objections, therefore. YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.