Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iobi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iobi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have an obvious WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There doesn't appear to be any sources independent of Verizon and no evidence of WP:SIGCOV. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Iobinetwork (username indicates WP:COI, just removed the AfD template, I have restored it. Boleyn (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: self-promoting but insufficiently notable for a stand-alone article. Nirva20 (talk) 22:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.