Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Involution (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Involution (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:SIGCOV. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a link from Bloody Disgusting. Needs more coverage in order to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 23:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 23:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Review (at Nocturno (magazine) [it]) and here. At least.— MY, OH, MY! (mushy yank) — 14:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources given don't meet SIGCOV, was unable to find anything more promising. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 19:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Additional: You also have a review on Cineclandestino (It). And this (Fr) Screenings at various festivals (Sitges Film Festival) ([1]); Fest [2]) and Soho Horror Fest [3]). The trailer has attracted attention from Bloody Disgusting, as The Film Creator explains, but also from other media.— MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) — 21:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom

FuzzyMagma (talk) 21:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: doesn't meet the requirements of SIGCOV 1keyhole (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.