Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inverkeilor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was The result was keep: (nomination withdrawn). Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inverkeilor[edit]

Very unnotable place in Scotland is the reason why it should go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jet2006 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 9 November 2006

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - as per WP:AFDP precedents, Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size -- Whpq 18:57, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All towns are notable. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 18:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. It gets 17,000 Google hits [1]. Hut 8.5 20:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. It's a place, so it should be kept. Needs to be expanded, though. Spinach Dip 22:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it exists, it stays. Nuttah68 23:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, real, verifiable place. Lankiveil 01:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Keep It's a real place in Angus. Now it needs a real article. Robovski 03:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided that the article can stay, no more views. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jet2006 (talk • contribs) .

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.