Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intrinsic value (numismatics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Intrinsic value (numismatics)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page should be deleted because of its coatrack content that does with the effects of intrinsic value rather than the concept of intrinsic value itself, which is already addressed at pages such as Penny (United States coin) and Gresham's law. Whatever is left of the definition can either go to Wiktionary, or merged into the dab page Intrinsic value. NotReallySoroka (talk) 07:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per nom, this is a tangential article which gets away from the core issue. WP:Coatrack applies. --Whiteguru (talk) 21:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 05:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.