Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Hollywood Groove
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and redirect to Remixed & Revisited. Since it was never sold, the track itself can't have charted on any chart based on sales, and even if it did receive some airplay, that's not enough per WP:MUSIC#Songs. A redirect to its parent EP is reasonable, though. Black Kite 18:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Into the Hollywood Groove[edit]
- Into the Hollywood Groove (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Promo single only, no references and full of original research Paul75 (talk) 04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- treelo radda 00:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If the charting can be sourced then keep. Otherwise delete due to lack of RS. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect - Even with sources for the charting, none give it notability. If it placed first, it is inherently notable, but 2nd on a minor chart in Japan just doesn't cut it. DARTH PANDAduel 02:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 04:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect Seems reasonable as way to include this information as there is not adequate notability to support independent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Barely notable, a fairly unknown single, it does not have an reliable references and it barely has any references at all! – Jerryteps 22:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Promo CD advertising and given away at the GAP. No references. DOUBLEBLUE (talk) 07:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.