Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstate 20 closure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 20 closure[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a one-time news event. A412 (Talk • C) 00:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge - This article covers an event similar to the Interstate 85 bridge collapse which is closing down an entire highway. At a minimum, this article should be merged into Interstate 20. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—the event is already covered in Interstate 20 in Georgia, and it does not warrant a stand-alone article as it won't have the lasting impact of the I-85 event. Unlike that event that has closed I-85 for months, I-20 has already been partially reopened, and repairs are expected to be completed tomorrow. Imzadi 1979 → 01:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- To follow up, according to local media, the highway reopened at 6:30 a.m. this morning (Tuesday). So yeah, nothing to see here other than a construction accident without any lasting impact. Imzadi 1979 → 22:13, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Imzadi as a news event with little lasting impact. "Pepper" @ 03:41, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Imzadi. Nothing like the I-85 collapse, and by next week no one will even remember this happened. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 04:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Do we have a list of notable highway buckles? I'm not proposing that we create one, but if we did, that would be the place to merge. Failing that, the relevant details are already covered elsewhere, so this should be deleted per Imzadi. –Fredddie ™ 22:15, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a news events of minimal significance. Lepricavark (talk) 18:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 04:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insignificant news with no lasting effect that fails WP:NEVENT. Ajf773 (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTNEWS. --Rs chen 7754 04:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.