Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Service Providers Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter¹²³ (warn) 17:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Service Providers Association[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organisation. Fails WP:NCORP Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Significant trade body. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

and... how do we know this? There isn't evidence of this in the article as far as I can see. Ajf773 (talk) 17:55, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We know this because we go on the internet and have a look! This is AfD, not cleanup! -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And you did this and found what exactly? I found nothing of any significance to support notability. Ajf773 (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This organisation can be seen to have presented to the UK parliament, both in oral hearings and in writing, for example, on the Investigatory Powers Bill (now Act) (pages 356-68 of [1], also reported in New Scientist) and the ongoing Digital Economy Bill ([2]). AllyD (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable industry association; significant RS coverage not found, while this content belongs on the org's web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.