Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internationalist Workers' Tendency
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as hoax. Sandstein 17:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Internationalist Workers' Tendency[edit]
- Internationalist Workers' Tendency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article reads like an ad. No references at all (the two ref tags lead to no info about the organisation). I put a multiple issues tag on the article in April, since then no improvement. Not only does it seem that this don't pass notabilit criteria, a google search gives no indication to the existance of the organisation. Its website [1] does not contain any contact address or phone numbers, no records of any activity of the organisation. It might thus be a hoax altogether or a one-man internet stunt. Soman (talk) 07:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I am pretty sure that neither of those two articles never mention the subject of this article. Fails WP:RS, WP:V LonelyBeacon (talk) 09:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neither sources say a word about this subject. In fact one of them is about American interests in North Korea. Possibly a WP:HOAX or at least fails WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as hoax, this tendency doesn't exist (see for instance http://www.trotskyism.org/intl.htm). This article is a parody of the many small Trotskyite groupscles that exist in the UK. The Tooting Popular Front (a redlink in the see also section) is a dead giveaway - this is a joke reference to the 1970s popular comedy Citizen Smith. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 23:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.