Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reaction to the Inauguration of Barack Obama
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Inauguration of Barack Obama. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
International reaction to the Inauguration of Barack Obama[edit]
- International reaction to the Inauguration of Barack Obama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article was created with text copied from Inauguration of Barack Obama. There was no discussion to split the article. Editors of main article do not wish to separate this text from article at this time, see Talk:Inauguration_of_Barack_Obama#New_articles.3F. Thanks. Aaron charles (talk) 23:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I concur with several responses that when deleting this split article, it makes sense to redirect the link to the main article. Thank you. Aaron charles (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete redundant text.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Redundant and excessive. Could have simply been redirected. Reywas92Talk 00:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because of redundant article. MathCool10 Sign here! 02:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect until/unless there is consensus to split. Because it is a plausible daughter article, however, I wouldn't delete it outright. It couldn't hurt to retain the page history for future reference. Cosmic Latte (talk) 03:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just a quick point of clarification. There is no original text to merge. It was copied from the article Inauguration of Barack Obama and has not been altered. Thanks. Aaron charles (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect, a separate article was never warranted here. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete one level of splitting too far Sceptre (talk) 09:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge back - no need for this AfD. Bearian (talk) 00:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to main article --Muhammad(talk) 03:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Plausible search keywords Gotyear (talk) 17:12, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Redirect, I don't think many people would type that in the search box though. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 22:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.