Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Wrestling Syndicate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Walton^talk 16:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Wrestling Syndicate[edit]

Non notable fed, poorly written and referenced article. Darrenhusted 13:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —Darrenhusted 13:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IWS is one of, if not the most notable indy promotion in Canada. Do some research before nominating AfD's next time. --DanZero 15:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC) While not an SPA DanZero has made few contributions outside of AfD debates[reply]

"Do some research before nominating AfD's next time.", I suggest you tone it down. Vote and/or improve the articles. Quit the snarking at me. Darrenhusted 15:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, notable subject matter, Danzero may have expressed himself poorly, but he is correct. Callelinea 15:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, then improve the article, because as it stands it's very poor. Darrenhusted 16:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, The IWS is a really good Wrestling Fed, and the articles are all true. Keep. Crowbar91 While not an SPA, this user has few edits outside of the article up for deletion.
Strong Delete, Fails WP:V, and WP:CORP, seemingly could also be a walled garden. Bmg916^Speak 14:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per BMG. Nikki311 04:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.