Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Weather Almanac 2001

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Chick Bowen 00:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

International Weather Almanac 2001[edit]

Group nomination of this page and its 2003 and 2005 equivalents. All three were created in May by PC3700DDR (talk · contribs) who has since been inactive. They remain sub-stubs with little or no content. There may eventually be some value in creating such articles (though I frankly doubt it) but since no one has made any significant edits in any of them over their six-month life here, it seems that they are bound to remain very low-quality stubs. I would have proded all of them, except one already was and the prod was removed by the creator (with no explanation of course). Pascal.Tesson 03:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then prod it again and tell them, to provide a reason when removing that tag. Also, I suspect they either copied from a print source by the same name or that they are working from memory. Either would make for bad articles through copyright violation or verifiability issues respectively. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no requirement to provide a reason; the page at WP:PROD says "should" provide a reason. And once de-prodded, you don't re-prod, you bring it to AfD. Which I assume to be the case here; therefore...Delete. -- SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 14:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, virtually no content. Looks like the author had a grand plan to keep a diary of global weather, then got bored and never returned. --DeLarge 19:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.