Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Velvet (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to International Velvet (album). (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 (ICE-TICE CUBE) 11:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

International Velvet (song)[edit]

International Velvet (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although the song has gained a cult following in Wales, there is not "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article", as stated by WP:NSONGS. It has not charted, nor has it won any awards. All the information from the second paragraph can be easily worked into the article for the parent album, but the first paragraph is citing a user-generated lyrics site, so this information is not usable. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Uncle G: There's nothing wrong the redirect, and I'm supporting turning it back into a redirect. I brought it to AfD because there's some useful information in the article. Am I missing something? ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to International Velvet (album). This one is a close call because the song has some media notice in lists of favorite Welsh songs, and a few media sources in that country actually call it an "unofficial anthem", but without much further comment. (I suspect that the article's claims of massive cultural influence are exaggerated.) All of this is already said at the album's article, so just redirect to there. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to International Velvet (album). Fails WP:NSONG per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.