Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Journal of Hospital Research

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 06:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

International Journal of Hospital Research[edit]

International Journal of Hospital Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG Vanjagenije (talk) 09:20, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Thanks Vanjagenije, I PRODded this and when it was de-PRODded, forgot to take it to AfD... No sources, no notability. --Randykitty (talk) 09:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 16 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per WP:Too soon. Insufficient substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources to meet the requirements of any of our notability guidelines. Maybe in a few years, after the journal establishes a reputation, but not at this time. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 18:14, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NJOURNALS.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I totally aggree with Dominus Vobisdu. If the journals earns scientific reputation it could be included but not today. --Shisha-Tom (talk) 15:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.