Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Institute of Market Research and Analytics (IIMRA)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 00:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Institute of Market Research and Analytics (IIMRA)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Private university" with no reliable secondary sources. Looks like this has been speedied a couple of times as unambiguous advertising; I prodded it earlier today after seeing it spammed across See-Also sections, but a new editor opposed it by adding a Blogspot blog source. McGeddon (talk) 12:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one who added this page's link in multiple wikipedia pages (which are relevant to Market research and management). My intention was not to advertise but to spread market research in developing countries like India, Indonesia, Nigeria etc. I was not aware that my actions would be considered as advertising. Even I do not have any direct relationship with this University. But have to admit one thing, this institute is doing a great job in above mentioned countries where awareness about market research is very minimum. I tried to contribute some thing to the Bottom of Pyramid Youth population in developing counties by spreading market research (since market research has high employment generation capacity). I can remove those unnecessary links of this page in other wiki pages since it is seen as advertising. I am collecting the secondary sources right now and could add dome more sources soon. Believe you can understand. Thank you. Lincolnlatest123 (Lincolnlatest123|talk)

@User:Lincolnlatest123 This type of institute or private universities actually are responsible for hundreds of deaths. They do nothing good than monetary extraction from poor people in the name of employment. And re: There are many people who are thinking of "the Bottom of Pyramid Youth population in developing counties". So you do not have to worry. Solomon7968 (talk) 10:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (whisper) @ 13:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (cackle) @ 13:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (gas) @ 13:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A training program, not a university. When it has done great work to the extents that it is written about substantially in published 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, then there can be an article. DGG ( talk ) 00:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 02:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence found that this vocational training centre is notable. AllyD (talk) 06:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per nom. Solomon7968 (talk) 10:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.