Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Center for Advanced Internet Research

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

International Center for Advanced Internet Research[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Kvng with the following rationale " numerous incoming wikilinks and contribution from multiple editors over years indicate potentially controversial deletion". Nothing here, however, nor in any sources I could find, suggests this organization passes WP:NORG. As such, the only suggestion other than the usual outright deletion I'd have is to redirect this to Northwestern University, if it is located at that place (I am not sure, the Northwestern University article doesn't even mention this organization). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to find any non-WP:SPS that discuss this as the main topic. I can only find tangential mentions.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.