Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Biennale of Architecture in Kraków

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

International Biennale of Architecture in Kraków[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (events) requirement." It was deprodded by User:User0253 with no rationale. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Just because it exists on plwiki does not mean that it satisfies notability guidelines. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 02:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found 2 sources in English in a quick search which I added to the article. I don't know Polish, but searching for the Polish words brings up articles that Google translate tells me are about the topic. The article passes notability, but does need copyedit. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 14:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.