Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internal Market in Electricity Directive (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the article subject is notable. Splitting can be discussed outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 09:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Internal Market in Electricity Directive[edit]

Internal Market in Electricity Directive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Chidgk1 (talk) 08:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Definitely notable, just not sourced. All EU directives have massive coverage in multiple languages in RIS. Mccapra (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The nominator does not provide any support to document why he considers this to be 'non-notable' and therefore gives no real rational for delete. Directives issues by the European Parliament are the legal acts which detail the laws within the EU and (in my opinion) are generally going to notable on that basis alone (i.e. they are the fundamental laws of largest political and economic union in the world). Disregarding this there is still plenty of coverage on this particular topic to warrant notability. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]Tracland (talk) 07:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Liberalisation of the EU electricity market: Directive 2003/54". Practical Law Company.
  2. ^ Burkhalter, Cansu. Legal and Regulatory Framework of European Energy Markets.
  3. ^ Roggenjamp, Martha. European Energy Law Report I.
  4. ^ "Third Energy Package (Directive on electricity 2009/72/EC, repealing Directive 2003/54/EC and Directive on gas 2009/73/EC, repealing Directive 2003/55/EC)". Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
  5. ^ Electricity Trade in Europe: Review of Economic and Regulatory Challenges. Kluwer Law International B.V.
  6. ^ "INTRODUCING ENERGY SECTOR REGULATION IN GERMANY: A SIGNIFICANT STEP FORWARD OR THE DEATH KNELL FOR COMPETITION?" (PDF). Hogan Lovells.
  7. ^ Thomas, Steve. "The European Union Gas and Electricity Directives" (PDF).
  8. ^ Bohm, Judit. "COMPETITION IN ELECTRICITY MARKET ACCORDING TO THEREGULATION OF DIRECTIVE 2003/54/ EC" (PDF).
  9. ^ "Property Law and Free Movement of Capital Limits to the Implementation of the Ownership Unbundling in the Energy Sector" (PDF).
Comment There is no doubt that the article could be better sources and could be improved but this is not itself a reason to delete the article. Unfortunately I don't know enough about the topic to make the necessary improvements.Tracland (talk) 07:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Split into separate articles on all of the three (yes, three - Directives 96/92/EC, 2003/54/EC and 2009/72/EC!) separate pieces of legislation which are discussed by this one single article. Some of those pieces of legislation may not be independently notable, but it is virtually impossible to make any sort of reasonable decision on whether the subject of the article is notable, when the subject of the article is so many different directives - and yet the infobox only talks about one of them! Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 09:41, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.