Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interference.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 16:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interference.com[edit]

Fails WP:WEB. No awards, no well-known distributer, and I'm not able to find any stories about this site from independent reliable sources, let alone multiple. The author seems to be asserting its notability on the basis of the number of registered users, which is not a valid criterion. Kafziel ^Talk 15:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's rank of 40,873 on Alexa isn't bad, but it's not enough to justify notability unless there were significant media coverage of the site (which I couldn't find evidence of). -bobby 16:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Article asserts notability as largest fan club. Only 1 can be the largest. However, claims are unsubstantiated so do not know how true they are. Chris Kreider 16:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assertion of notability is only valid for avoiding speedy deletion, not AfD. AfD requires proof of notability. Even if they can prove it's the biggest, superlatives aren't part of the criteria for notability of websites; someone might have the only fan club for some incredibly obscure actor, but the site doesn't get its own article just because it's the biggest. Kafziel ^Talk 17:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.