Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interfaith scriptural reading

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Proposed article was already CSD A7 deleted, the creation of this article was an apparent accident. Kylu (talk) 03:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interfaith scriptural reading[edit]

Appears created to support Scriptural reasoning article: no obvious independent notability. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:42, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am open to whatever decision is made for this article. Not inclined to fight this one.

The article was not created to "support" Scriptural Reasoning but on the contrary rather to establish the existence of a number of different practices of interfaith scriptural reading of which Scriptural Reasoning is just one (relatively small and unimportant part). In other words, Scriptural Reasoning is not so important, because there are a number of activities which are notable being reported independently in international press and media such as the Archbishop of Canterbury's Building Bridges Seminar -- international meetings across the Middle East and Europe and the USA. The Jewish-Christian-Muslim Conference and various other scholarly resources from different groups around the world which practice text-based dialogue between faiths -- all this is notable and needs coverage -- somewhere no Wikipedia.

There is no article under the category of Interreligious Dialogue which addresses the large variety of practices of people of different faiths meeting togther to study their sacred scriptures. If you can identify another article which covers this area then please let me know, and the topic can be addressed there. But I can't see any.

--Scripturalreasoning (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but doesn't this AfD refer to an article that contains nothing but an AfD tag? Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Response. Um, yes. That's because I TWINKLEd it a minute after it was speedied. I couldn't decide whether to restore it, or remove the AfD.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, blank page, move along, nothing to see here! pablo_hablo. 23:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete I just put an A3 tag on the page -- it should be gone shortly. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.