Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interfaculty Committee Agraria (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interfaculty Committee Agraria[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No WP:SIGCOV found on a WP:BEFORE. All 3 sources are the company's website. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 08:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, Schools, and Biology. CptViraj (talk) 08:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

leaning Keep on this one, but the sourcing on the page is not sufficient. The ICA is an actual network of universities (not a company) and thus in a similar vein to, for instance, the European University Association. There are plenty of mentions of it, but coverage of it in secondary sources that are independent of it can be trickier. If a university mentions it[1] for instance, then we have to contend with those mentions being non-independent and perhaps trivial. But there is coverage in plenty of secondary sources. For instance in European Guide for Students of Agriculture, Education in Agriculture and Food Science, Impact and Resilience "... the largest European educational network for life sciences education..." and many more. Multiple secondary sources are more than met. Many of the mentions (but not all) are trivial, but this appears to cross the line for WP:GNG. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.