Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interface culture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Interface culture[edit]
- Interface culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism that I can't find any use of, outside of the creator's own works. Doesn't seem to have gone mainstream yet, and non-notable. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 21:05, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - one isolated idea in one notable essay does not merit its own separate article. Diego (talk) 20:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - The term is not quite as obscure as the proposer suggests. It's the title of a Stephenson book Interface Culture) which was itself excerpted in The Atlantic Monthly. It's used by a notable research group at Linz [1]. Matthais Müller-Prove uses it as a synonym for new media or technoculture [2]. I'd be inclined to nurture this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkBernstein (talk • contribs) 16:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete an article about the topic, a blog about the concept, and one section in a book doesn't meet GNG "significant coverage" guidelines. --Joshuaism (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.