Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interaction Styles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this topic doesn't meet the notability guideline. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 19:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interaction Styles[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only sources documenting the Interaction Styles scheme itself appear to originate with Linda V. Berens or the Temperament Research Institute. Would need citations to reliable third-party sources to demonstrate notability. Unclear that this scheme is based on any actual research as opposed to just a framework to support a commercial enterprise; MBTIs themselves have been challenged as invalid, and this is a derivation of a derivation of that. -- Beland (talk) 19:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 22:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article looks as if it exists to promoted the author's work. It also contains a large amount of original academic-style research. A search for sources leads mostly to the Berens web site. (n.b. There is also a conflicting concept in the field of computer programming that deals with how people interact with computers. There are many more sources for that than there are for this model.) I would have to say GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and ThatMontrealIP. No evidence of independent notability.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.