Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter Miladz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete CSD A7, I don't really think winning eighth times a seven-a-side football league composed by only three teams is a claim of notability. As mentioned on WP:SD, an article fits CSD A7 when it does not indicate why the subject is important. There is no indication of such sort in the article, so I think it fits well CSD A7. --Angelo (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Inter Miladz

Inter Miladz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not referenced; amateur teenage team without their own kit Aatomic1 (talk) 10:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC

• Delete, I'm not sure what's going on here, but I'm fairly sure they're not notable. Lankiveil (talk) 11:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC).
• Speedy delete per #A7, no indication of importance/significance. пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • "The "Ladz" stuck with it and went on to win the league 8 times (octruple)." is a claim to notability of a sort, so speedy is not appropriate, but this is still a 100% non-notable team so delete ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Seems to fail notability and is stuffed full of WP:OR. Borderline A7. Looks more like a running blog than an encyclopedia entry. Pedro :  Chat  11:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.