Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellihot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intellihot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Google search shows no real in-depth coverage, only the sort of coverage that any corporation can get. See corporate notability guidelines. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep well sourced article which easily passes WP:GNG. Inwind (talk) 08:42, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Lacking in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. The one reference that is border-line acceptable is the Midwest Energy News because it seems to have editorial control. But it is one small regional news site. A few more like that might be enough to establish notability. MB 02:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable business. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:57, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.