Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual dishonesty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intellectual dishonesty[edit]

Finishing incomplete nom by User:Kaiwhakahaere. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is more than a year since a notice was put on this asking for references. No-one has bothered in all that time, so it is a totally unreferenced entry which makes it very much opinion and not able to justify inclusion in an encyclopedia like Wikipedia.Kaiwhakahaere (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. WP:Sofixit. There is plenty out there _directly_ addressing the concept. The concept of intellectual dishonesty has received widespread coverage "...by sources [that] address the subject directly in detail" "...in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Mostlyharmless (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article is on the agendas of two WikiProjects, it will be improved eventually.--Son of Somebody (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SOFIXIT; existing sources indicate that this is a subject of note. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The phrase is frequently used in the popular culture, especially on talk radio.--Focusfrost (talk) 01:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.