Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellectual Input

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Intellectual Input

Hoax article based on original research. Essentially it duplicates the thesis of intelligent design, but does so poorly. Although the author claims that "Despite Intellectual Input sometimes being referred to popularly and in the media as "Intellectual Input Theory," it is a scientific theory by any commonly used definition of that term.", a google search for "Intellectual Input Theory" yields no hits, and one for "intellectual input" yields only unrelated results. Delete: Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine --anetode¹ ² ³ 06:27, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete original research. Gazpacho 06:51, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Edwardian 07:12, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete OR.-- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 12:57, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - original research. Page now essentially blanked by originator, tagged for speedy. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 15:05, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I removed the speedy tag in view of the page history: the original version is not speediable and three "different" users have edited the page. Physchim62 (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.