Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrity (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  JGHowes  talk 00:02, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Integrity (band)[edit]

Integrity (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page, non-notable subject. I-Bin-A-Bibi (talk) 23:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. I-Bin-A-Bibi (talk) 23:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - agree that the quality of the page can be questioned, but the band has enough news coverage to pass GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 23:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a notable band. Yes, the quality is not the best, but there are many reliable sources. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 15:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Same reasons as previous votes. Kire1975 (talk) 02:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete - Changed my mind. Yes, there are a few articles in reliable sources like Cleveland.com and MTV.com but they are all WP:INTERVIEWs and therefore not secondary or indpependent: "The general rule is that any statements made by interviewees about themselves, their activities, or anything they are connected to is considered to have come from a primary-source and is non-independent material." --Kire1975 (talk) 06:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep The article has some problems but can be fixed easily. I find that the albums from this band don't warrant articles themselves but that's a different issue. Overall there are enough reliable sources to meet WP:BAND. JayJayWhat did I do? 03:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as they have significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as this staff written bio at AllMusic here which isn't an interview and there are albukm reviews there, passing WP:GNG imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.