Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated Media Association
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Integrated Media Association[edit]
- Integrated Media Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
All I can find are press releases, or non-reliable/non-independent sources, and a lack of significant coverage about this organisation. I also found a lot about the Yellow Pages Integrated Media Association in NJ, which would appear to be unconnected with this one. I can find no evidence that the organisation meet the notability criteria PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Deliberately uninformative text is patent nonsense, and this is deliberately uninformative: mission is to facilitate a transition in public media to a truly innovative and collaborative industry.... an opportunity to bring together individuals who are focused on innovation and advancing the industry so they can learn about the creative activities from around the country along with relevant technology trends and directions. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of media coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.