Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integral City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Integral City[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a non-notable pseudoscientific theory that's effectively being used to promote the theory. All of the citations are to the originator's own publications. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 20:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NBOOK multiple book reviews. The article as nominated was in bad shape. I've refactored it as a book article and removed most of the content which was poorly formatted and incomprehensible. Added book reviews and citations. --Green Cardamom (talk) 05:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Green Cardamom's good work in cleaning up this article and adding independent reliable sources has both shown the topic to be notable and has fixed the severe problems with the article. Nicely done. --Mark viking (talk) 15:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.