Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsureMyTrip.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

InsureMyTrip.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:58, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete references are primarily promotional. DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm the paid editor who created this article. I believe that InsureMyTrip.com is notable because the company created the first travel insurance aggregator website. This is a big deal as IMT gave people the opportunity to compare travel insurance plans and then leave reviews about them. Much of the information about this has been deleted from the article. I propose that the deleted section be re-inserted, discussion take place about the article on the Talk page, and then the article be revised. I did extensive research about the travel insurance industry and as a result, was planning on updating the Travel_insurance article, which has multiple issues. Djhuff (talk) 22:19, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - per nom. -KH-1 (talk) 00:30, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per Djhuff and his plan to improve the article, The fact that the company created the first travel insurance aggregator website makes the company notable. WP:N The fact that the creator of the article has now declared himself as a paid editor should not even be germane to this discussion. Again, let us have no prejudices against the article itself because of who happened to create it. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 21:05, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No-one has commented on paid ediotr status, other than the user themselves. It's not really relevant. Also, why is all your text in bold- assume it was a syntax mistake? Joseph2302 (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing in the article saying it is the first aggregator. Brianhe (talk) 04:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's because someone removed it once I declared my "paid editor" status. It is the first travel insurance aggregator website. Djhuff (talk) 20:54, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment Yes just didn't get the quote marks on correctly. Thanks for adjusting that. Cheers! WordSeventeen (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to fail WP:CORP, and article is WP:PROMO. AusLondonder (talk) 06:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Transparent WP:ADMASQ by a confessed paid editor. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James N. Grace. Pax 10:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's a nice little sourced article but it is not notable, News gave several results (with some press releases) but they're all part of travel tips and such are in passing and Books provided nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 20:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SwisterTwister and Joseph2302 . Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.