Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insurance Licensing Services of America, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 02:30, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insurance Licensing Services of America, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A gentleman on Twitter has recently admitted that he was paid to create this article. That notwithstanding, the article doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP, and the sources seem to be PR pieces. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 01:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no actual claim to notability in the article, and the sources are press releases from the company or trivial mentions of corporate officers. --bonadea contributions talk 12:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, which is probably a good idea when confronted with paid editing. No reliable sources cited in the article, and none found on GNews/Books/Scholar. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Advertisement that does not meet notability guidelines. The conflict of interest issue is especially concerning.--res Laozi speak 13:39, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet WP:CORP. Will Beback talk 22:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. As noted, there are a series of related AfD's going on, created by the same group of users: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arleen Taveras (along with the article on Ted Taveras) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archimedes, Inc.. User:Danieldis47 and User:Etalssrs seem to be "associates". --res Laozi speak 05:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this walled garden of WP:SPAM (along with Ted Taveras and Arleen Taveras. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 07:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt no sources. Racepacket (talk) 13:05, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - should have been speedied already, no credible claim of notability per WP:CORP. ukexpat (talk) 15:57, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.