Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institutional System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anarchyte (talk) 06:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Institutional System[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a completely unsourced and unencyclopedic stub with dangling sentence fragments and virtually no in-links. Created in 2016 with a title that returns no results in Google books referring to French law (ostensibly what the article is about). Otoh, Gaius' textbook "Institutions" described a system in ancient Rome from which French civil law apparently took some features, but if this article is entitled "Institutional System" then it should be about ancient Roman law (as is the German article de:Institutionensystem, linked to this via d:Q1665194) or else if it's about French law then it should be called "Civil law in France", as is the French article (fr:Droit civil en France) linked to Q1665194. In short, a schizophrenic article with no sources, a mess; just put it out of its mercy and let someone recreate "Institutional system" based on the German article, and Civil law in France based on the French article without having to deal with this. Mathglot (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Mathglot (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Mathglot (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included at WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. Mathglot (talk) 05:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with Mathglot. Confusing and confused article which would barely scrape a pass mark at undergraduate level. Nwhyte (talk) 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.