Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 23:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad[edit]

Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy WP:schooloutcomes or WP:nschool or wp:org. WP:RS absent. Vikram Vincent 13:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC) * Propose a merge with the university page, since that is notable. Vikram Vincent 10:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 13:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I couldn't anything about this school that isn't trivial or written like a non-neutral advertisement. So the article clearly fails WP:NORG. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Accredited degree-awarding tertiary institution, so most certainly satisfies WP:Schooloutcomes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The accreditation thing aside, from the article I got the impression that it it's a private educational institution. As far as I'm aware private educational institutions have higher standards to follow for them be notable compared to public ones. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment From WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, schooloutcomes should be added to the Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, as it is an accurate statement of the results but promotes circular reasoning. Vikram Vincent 11:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep One of the old management institutes in India. Degree awarded institute which is affiliated with a recognized university Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University. Here is my argument for similar institutions. DMySon 18:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:37, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go Phightins! 11:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment unless someone can come with with WP:THREE sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOLS the article needs to be deleted. The last few pages I nominated for AFD are being deleted so the "consensus" is moving to delete non-notable tertiary institutes. Vikram Vincent 06:53, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV, and fails criteria 3 of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES because the article fails WP:ORG. Editors who haven't read SCHOOLOUTCOMES in awhile, will be surprised to see that the language of that policy changed after an RFC in 2017.4meter4 (talk) 00:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.