Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Install/Uninstall Testing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted per G12: copyvio. Writ Keeper  19:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Install/Uninstall Testing[edit]

Install/Uninstall Testing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Nomination for speedy deletion under G11 was declined by @Ks0stm:. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 17:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 17:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. G11 wasn't the right fit, but clear case of WP:NOTHOWTO. Could potentially be an includible topic, but would probably be best to blow it up and start over the way the article is written right now. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm (TCGE) 18:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - a majority of the article is copied directly, word for word from the "references" below, which are not properly cited in the article itself. This seems to be a string of what looks like maybe a class project of some sort today... also reads like a How-to article Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment also potentially related: Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk
And another one:
  • Delete I'd say merge to Installation testing but so much of the content is copyvio that we would be better off to blow this new article up and just rewrite Installation testing with more detail. Meters (talk) 18:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And with sourcing, of course. Meters (talk) 18:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.