Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insperity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America1000 15:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Insperity[edit]

Insperity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All WP:LISTED organisations are not directly notable. Insperity is such company that it doesn’t realise WP:NCORP policy I feel. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete despite claims of passing NCORP, the sources here are all WP:MILL and press releases. Name change being reported is not coverage and I can't find anything remotely substantial about the company. CUPIDICAE💕 19:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Analyst reports are not WP:MILL and in general are accepted to meet ORGIND and CORPDEPTH. HighKing++ 10:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.