Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside the Mind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kubigula (talk) 12:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inside the Mind[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like its just-announced sister film set in the world of Dia de los Muertos, this article is way ahead of the film being in final production, per WP:NFF. Needs to be deleted and redirected to Pixar until actual production of the film commences. McDoob AU 93 11:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. --McDoob AU 93 12:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until an actual title as opposed to a phrase such as "The untitled Pixar film that takes you inside the mind". Re-create when an actual title is revealed. Georgia guy (talk) 12:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pixar#Product pipeline to prevent premature article recreation. Delete stub. WP:NFF exists to prevent premature articles on films "planned" to be shot years into the future. Since policy does allow that properly sourced information on future events might at least be spoken of somewhere, and we do not as yet have enough information OR enough sourcing for this to even be considered as a possible exception to the guideline for unmade films, we can send readres to the one place where it might be mentioned in context to Pixar's plans for future films. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:56, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFF. Given that it seems even the title is not decided (WP:HAMMER, anyone?) even a redirect seems pointless. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As per The Good Dinosaur. 109.149.86.254 (talk) 21:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That one is premature as well. Until the project has commenced principal filming... or if not, has such a tremendous amount of ongoing and persistant coverage to perhaps merit being a possible exception to guideline to have a separate article... the best place to speak about "planned" films is in the article about the company doing the planning. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NFF is clear. Should really have been speedily redirected. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This project is actually referred to as Untitled Pixar Project that Takes You Inside the Mind so this is not needed as a redirect. When it gets a title or better yet some actual information about it is covered in sources it can return, but until then a brief mention at Pixar#Product pipeline is all the coverage that is warranted. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.