Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside-AOL.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Adrian Lamo. Content may be merged elsewhere as seen fit. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:41, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inside-AOL.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about an inactive website lacks notability Poyani (talk) 01:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge to AOL#Controversies. This website was significant in its day and its content shouldn't be deleted. I think the merge is the best option, personally. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 03:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Adrian Lamo, the site's major maintainer (and original creator of this article in the first place). AOL is dead in the water but the content is still notable for its time period. Nate • (chatter) 04:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:WEB. LiteralKa (talk) 01:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.