Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inqwise

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - {{db-inc}} candidate. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inqwise[edit]

Inqwise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed to find enough coverage in reliable sources. A search mainly finds unreliable sources and press releases. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:07, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No-independent source found. The sources like this and this are not independent sources and do not provide the significant coverage required by the notability standard as per WP:COMPANY. Article is written like an advertisement A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 06:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 06:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.