Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InoForum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

InoForum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG, as there is no coverage by reliable sources (the only RS in the article does not even mention InoForum). Looks like an advertisement. Wikisaurus (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nominator. Fails GNG.Knox490 (talk) 04:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 21:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 21:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As per nom. Deathlibrarian (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as advertisement. TheodoreIndiana (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, advert --Devokewater (talk) 14:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.