Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innermost Circle of the All-Highest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Innermost Circle of the All-Highest[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All plot + no sources = fancruft. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no indication that this subject has been discussed by reliable sources in a meaningful way. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 21:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I created this article in my early days of editing here. It would perhaps be inappropriate to nominate it for deletion, but on re-reading it (I had wholly forgotten writing it) I am slightly ashamed of it and would not object to its deletion.----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just non-notable fancruft, that fails WP:GNG. Nowhere to really merge, or reason to keep._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 23:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fictional org. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and not even the usual list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing worth merging. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fictional. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:03, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.