Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iniga von Thurn und Taxis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 01:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iniga von Thurn und Taxis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article only details familial relationship to others as that's all there is to point to for notability WP:BLPFAMILY D1551D3N7 (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The whole content is birth, marriage, issue and death. Therfore no notability. --Theoreticalmawi (talk) 16:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The same can be said her the articles about her parents: Prince Ludwig Philipp of Thurn and Taxis and his wife Princess Elisabeth of Luxembourg, unless those are being deleted too... no question the article needs improvement but I think deletion might be a bit drastic. Uppagus (talk) 10:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources in the article do not support GNG (and several are non-RS), and I didn't see any other sources providing IRS SIGCOV.

JoelleJay (talk) 18:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.