Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingot certificate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ingot certificate[edit]

Prod contested (rationale was: objectionable reason for prod). I'm insulted. :-) My original prod rationale read

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. This organization is beyond obscure and is using Wikipedia as free webspace. No sign of any third-party coverage. Pascal.Tesson 13:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete advert of nn company. I wish them well, and when Fortune (magazine) or Time (magazine) does an article on them, we'll be happy to write a better article about them. KillerChihuahua^?!? 13:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam, no assertion of notability. Guy (Help!) 14:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: WP:CSD G11, blatant advertising, and borderline G1, patent nonsense. (I can get an engraved diploma from these folks if I demonstrate I can save a file. Wow!) - Smerdis of Tlön 15:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gold Delete. Wikipedia is not a class syllabus? -- Antepenultimate 18:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Super Speedy Delete FirefoxMan 00:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.