Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Information Assurance Advisory Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Information Assurance Advisory Council

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Information Assurance Advisory Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page of an organization failing WP:GNG. Reads like a promotional pamphlet, especially sections on activities. All substantial content is sourced to their own website, with nods to various secondary sources that briefly mention (usually once) the organization. No significant, non-routine coverage of the organization in reliable, independent sources; the closest any sources get to counting are a couple of press releases. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 18:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 18:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 18:09, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 01:06, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

• Delete The few sources that are not from the organisation itself are either routine coverage, press releases or churnalism of press releases. There is nothing that comes anywhere near meeting WP:NORG. SpinningSpark 23:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.