Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite Corridor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infinite Corridor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not seem to meet the notability criteria and has few sources. Am sure MIT is notable but a corridor at MIT? Shoud we have an article about every educational institutes' longest corridor? Stupidstudent (talk) 03:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't a sufficient reason to delete. If other institutions' corridors have also received significant coverage by reliable third-party sources, then yes, they should have articles like the infinite corridor. 674 book mentions, 145 scholarly mentions, and popular press coverage in Wired, Buffalo News, Kansas and Dallas, as well as the Boston Globe obviously. Also featured in a book title. Madcoverboy (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Shoud we have an article about every educational institutes' longest corridor? Most universities' longest corridors probably lack significant coverage. This one doesn't. Notability doesn't come packaged in neat categories. 160.39.212.104 (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Enough reliable sources to establish notability. Derild 49 21 ☼ 17:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There is enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Not every university corridor does, so I'm not sure what the nom is suggesting except maybe a slippery slope. --Oakshade (talk) 05:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.