Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infarct Combat Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus has formed after three relistings. Per discussion here, all seem to agree that there's a general parcity of sources at present about the organization, so perhaps this should be boldly merged. Further discussion about the article can continue on its talk page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infarct Combat Project[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and without content or evidence of notability Rathfelder (talk) 18:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see the kind of reliable source coverage that we need here, with the organization only having gotten a little bit of attention. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:33, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Coronary artery disease, without prejudice to recreation and expansion, if it can be shown in the future that there's significant coverage in secondary sources independent of the subject. Good luck, — Cirt (talk) 06:10, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:45, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mention at ischemic heart disease (if preferred) and redirect as there seems to be not much specifically for this aside from a few links at Books, browser and Highbeam. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:03, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.